chinchilla: bite fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.63
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, species
Weight: 0.53
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.52
, pet
Weight: 0.52
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36
, alpaca
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
bite fur 1.00
chew fur 0.91
eat fur 0.91
have fur 0.91
lose fur 0.87
pull out fur 0.86
bite 0.86
is rex fur 0.83
bite cage 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(guinea pig, have fur)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(animal, bite)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(guinea pig, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, have fur)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, bite cage)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(animal, bite)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(animal, bite)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, have fur)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have fur)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, bite cage)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(llama, have fur)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have fur)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(guinea pig, have fur)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(animal, bite)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(guinea pig, bite cage)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(alpaca, have fur)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(alpaca, have fur)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(llama, have fur)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(llama, have fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(chinchilla, bite fur)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chinchilla, have fur)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, eat fur)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, chew fur)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(chinchilla, eat fur)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, eat fur)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(chinchilla, chew fur)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chinchilla, chew fur)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, have fur)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, chew fur)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, pull out fur)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chinchilla, eat fur)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(chinchilla, pull out fur)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, pull out fur)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, bite cage)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, lose fur)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(chinchilla, bite cage)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite cage)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(chinchilla, pull out fur)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(chinchilla, bite)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, bite)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(chinchilla, have fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chinchilla, bite)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chinchilla, bite cage)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(chinchilla, lose fur)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, lose fur)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have fur)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chinchilla, lose fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(guinea pig, have fur)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(guinea pig, bite cage)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(animal, bite)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(alpaca, have fur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(llama, have fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(guinea pig, have fur)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(guinea pig, bite cage)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(animal, bite)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chinchilla, bite fur)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)