chinchilla: has physical part whiskers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.63
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, species
Weight: 0.53
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.52
, pet
Weight: 0.52
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36
, alpaca
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part whiskers 1.00
have long whiskers 0.94
has physical part tails 0.82
has physical part eyes 0.82
has physical part ears 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(guinea pig, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has physical part whiskers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has physical part whiskers)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(guinea pig, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have long whiskers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part ears)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part eyes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chinchilla, have long whiskers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has physical part tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has physical part ears)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, have long whiskers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has physical part eyes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part ears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part eyes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part ears)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chinchilla, have long whiskers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has physical part whiskers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has physical part whiskers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(chinchilla, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)