chinchilla: has state pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.63
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, species
Weight: 0.53
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.52
, pet
Weight: 0.52
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36
, alpaca
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pet 1.00
is good pet 0.94
has state pets 0.91
be as pets 0.85
is good pets 0.83
make pets 0.83
is bad pets 0.83
be better than cats 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(boa constrictor, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(boa constrictor, is good pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(boa constrictor, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(boa constrictor, has state pets)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(boa constrictor, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(boa constrictor, is good pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has state pet)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(chinchilla, make pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chinchilla, make pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, make pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, make pets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(boa constrictor, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(boa constrictor, is good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chinchilla, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)