chinchilla: has state pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.63
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, species
Weight: 0.53
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.52
, pet
Weight: 0.52
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36
, alpaca
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pets 1.00
be as pets 0.95
make pets 0.93
is good pets 0.93
is bad pets 0.93
has state pet 0.91
is good pet 0.85
be better than cats 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(boa constrictor, has state pets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(boa constrictor, is good pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(boa constrictor, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(boa constrictor, has state pets)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(boa constrictor, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(boa constrictor, is good pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has state pets)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chinchilla, make pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, make pets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(chinchilla, make pets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, make pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chinchilla, is good pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(boa constrictor, has state pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(boa constrictor, is good pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)