chinchilla: have babies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.63
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, species
Weight: 0.53
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.52
, pet
Weight: 0.52
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36
, alpaca
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have babies 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(llama, have babies)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have babies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chinchilla, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(llama, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(llama, have babies)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chinchilla, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(alpaca, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(alpaca, have babies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chinchilla, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(chinchilla, have babies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(chinchilla, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chinchilla, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have babies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chinchilla, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chinchilla, have babies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(llama, have babies)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(alpaca, have babies)