chinchilla: is good pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.63
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, species
Weight: 0.53
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.52
, pet
Weight: 0.52
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36
, alpaca
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good pets 1.00
is bad pets 0.98
be as pets 0.96
make pets 0.95
has state pets 0.93
is good pet 0.91
be better than cats 0.85
has state pet 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(boa constrictor, is good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(boa constrictor, has state pets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(boa constrictor, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(boa constrictor, is good pets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(boa constrictor, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(boa constrictor, has state pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(chinchilla, is good pets)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(chinchilla, make pets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chinchilla, make pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, make pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, make pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be as pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be better than cats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has state pet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(boa constrictor, is good pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(boa constrictor, has state pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has state pets)