chinese food: be say to be spicy

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, food
Weight: 0.70
, meal
Weight: 0.61
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dim sum
Weight: 0.60
, noodle
Weight: 0.54
, pet food
Weight: 0.40
, mexican food
Weight: 0.39
, junk food
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be say to be spicy 1.00
be spicy 0.95
be spicy hot 0.92
be spicy in flavor 0.91
taste salty 0.80
be very tasty 0.79
be eat from dish 0.79
be delicious 0.78
be very salty 0.78
be yummy 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(food, be yummy)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(fast food, be very salty)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chinese food, be say to be spicy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(fast food, be very salty)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(food, be yummy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be very salty)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(food, be yummy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, be spicy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, be very tasty)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(fast food, be very salty)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(food, be yummy)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese food, be say to be spicy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(mexican food, be very tasty)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(mexican food, be very tasty)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mexican food, be spicy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mexican food, be spicy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(chinese food, be say to be spicy)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(chinese food, be spicy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chinese food, be spicy in flavor)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be spicy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chinese food, be spicy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chinese food, be spicy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be spicy in flavor)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chinese food, be spicy in flavor)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(chinese food, be spicy in flavor)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(chinese food, be delicious)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be delicious)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chinese food, be delicious)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chinese food, be delicious)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chinese food, be say to be spicy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food, be yummy)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fast food, be very salty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mexican food, be spicy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mexican food, be very tasty)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food, be yummy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(chinese food, be say to be spicy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fast food, be very salty)