chinese restaurant: be at chinatown

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.77
, cafe
Weight: 0.68
, store
Weight: 0.64
, business
Weight: 0.63
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.58
, top floor
Weight: 0.56
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at chinatown 1.00
be used to eat japanese food 0.76
be at berkeley 0.75
be at chinese neighborhood 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat japanese food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to eat japanese food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to eat japanese food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at chinese neighborhood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(chinese restaurant, be at chinese neighborhood)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at chinese neighborhood)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinese neighborhood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to eat japanese food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chinese restaurant, be at chinatown)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)