chinese restaurant: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.77
, cafe
Weight: 0.68
, store
Weight: 0.64
, business
Weight: 0.63
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.58
, top floor
Weight: 0.56
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan 1.00
be at chicago 0.82
be at texas 0.80
be at california 0.80
be at tulsa 0.80
be at mexico 0.79
be at naples italy 0.78
be at southern california 0.75
be at every part of america 0.75
be at london 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cafe, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cafe, be at london)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cafe, be at naples italy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(store, be at every part of america)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(store, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cafe, be at michigan)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(store, be at texas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(store, be at every part of america)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cafe, be at naples italy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cafe, be at london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cafe, be at michigan)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(store, be at texas)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cafe, be at naples italy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cafe, be at london)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(store, be at every part of america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(cafe, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(store, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cafe, be at naples italy)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cafe, be at london)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(store, be at every part of america)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at california)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at california)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at california)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cafe, be at michigan)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(store, be at texas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cafe, be at naples italy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(store, be at every part of america)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cafe, be at london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at texas)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at mexico)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at california)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at california)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at tulsa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be at southern california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cafe, be at michigan)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(store, be at texas)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cafe, be at naples italy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cafe, be at london)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(store, be at every part of america)