chinese restaurant: be at new york

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.77
, cafe
Weight: 0.68
, store
Weight: 0.64
, business
Weight: 0.63
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.58
, top floor
Weight: 0.56
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new york 1.00
be at new york city 0.97
be at london 0.77
be at chicago 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cafe, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cafe, be at london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cafe, be at london)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cafe, be at london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(chinese restaurant, be at new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cafe, be at london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cafe, be at london)