chip: be better than women

Related concepts

Parents	computer hardware Weight: 0.60 , substrate Weight: 0.60 , fast food Weight: 0.60 , product Weight: 0.58 , snack Weight: 0.58
Siblings	potato chip Weight: 0.73 , processor Weight: 0.67 , microprocessor Weight: 0.65 , cpu Weight: 0.58 , motherboard Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be better than women	1.00
be better than others	0.88
be much better than others	0.87
be better than home	0.84
be much harder than gpus	0.81
other than skylake	0.80
do more harm than good	0.79
be more difficult than traditional products	0.76
be more difficult than products	0.76
be cheaper than healthy food	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(chip, be better than women)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(fast food, do more harm than good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(chip, be better than women)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(chip, be better than women)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(fast food, do more harm than good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(product, be more difficult than traditional products)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(fast food, do more harm than good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(motherboard, be better than others)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(processor, other than skylake)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(cpu, be much harder than gpus)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(chip, be better than women)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(fast food, do more harm than good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(chip, be better than women)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(chip, be better than women)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

Remarkable(motherboard, be better than others) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(motherboard, be better than others)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(cpu, be much harder than gpus) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(cpu, be much harder than gpus)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(processor, other than skylake) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(processor, other than skylake)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(chip, be better than women)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(chip, be better than women)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(fast food, do more harm than good)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(processor, other than skylake)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(motherboard, be better than others)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(cpu, be much harder than gpus)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(fast food, do more harm than good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(chip, be better than women) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)