chip: be in beauty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in beauty 1.00
be from beauty 0.99
was from beauty 0.97
be called chip in beauty 0.82
be chipped in beauty 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(chip, be in beauty)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chip, be from beauty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(chip, was from beauty)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chip, be called chip in beauty)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chip, be from beauty)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chip, was from beauty)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chip, be chipped in beauty)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chip, be chipped in beauty)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chip, be from beauty)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chip, be called chip in beauty)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chip, was from beauty)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chip, be from beauty)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(chip, be chipped in beauty)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chip, was from beauty)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chip, be chipped in beauty)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(chip, be called chip in beauty)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chip, be called chip in beauty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in beauty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(chip, be in beauty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chip, be in beauty)