chip: be in tarzan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in tarzan 1.00
be in nmos 1.00
get in in guatemala 0.85
be at 100 0.83
be on diffuculty 0.81
be at 100 time 0.79
be important in 1853 0.78
have one 0.77
remain for longer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(substrate, be in nmos)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(chip, be in tarzan)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(product, get in in guatemala)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(chip, be in tarzan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(substrate, be in nmos)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(product, get in in guatemala)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(substrate, be in nmos)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(product, get in in guatemala)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cpu, be at 100)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(cpu, be at 100 time)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be important in 1853)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(substrate, be in nmos)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chip, be in tarzan)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(product, get in in guatemala)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chip, be in tarzan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(cpu, be at 100 time)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cpu, be at 100 time)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(cpu, be at 100)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(potato chip, be important in 1853)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be important in 1853)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(chip, be in tarzan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(chip, be in tarzan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(substrate, be in nmos)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(product, get in in guatemala)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cpu, be at 100 time)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cpu, be at 100)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato chip, be important in 1853)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(substrate, be in nmos)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(chip, be in tarzan)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(product, get in in guatemala)