chip: go stale

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
go stale 1.00
get stale 0.98
become stale 0.95
taste bad reheated 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, go stale)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(potato chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(potato chip, go stale)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(chip, go stale)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(chip, become stale)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chip, become stale)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chip, become stale)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(chip, get stale)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(chip, get stale)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chip, get stale)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(chip, become stale)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chip, get stale)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chip, taste bad reheated)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(chip, taste bad reheated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(chip, taste bad reheated)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chip, taste bad reheated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chip, go stale)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(chip, go stale)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chip, go stale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(potato chip, go stale)