chipmunk: defend themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, animal
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, frog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend themselves 1.00
protect themselves 0.89
clean themselves 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, defend themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(tree frog, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tree frog, defend themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(chipmunk, defend themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(chipmunk, clean themselves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chipmunk, clean themselves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(chipmunk, clean themselves)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chipmunk, protect themselves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(chipmunk, clean themselves)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chipmunk, protect themselves)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(chipmunk, protect themselves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chipmunk, protect themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chipmunk, defend themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(chipmunk, defend themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chipmunk, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(tree frog, defend themselves)