chipmunk: run in circles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, animal
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, frog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
run in circles 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chipmunk, run in circles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, run in circles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(chipmunk, run in circles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(rabbit, run in circles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(rabbit, run in circles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(chipmunk, run in circles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(chipmunk, run in circles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(chipmunk, run in circles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chipmunk, run in circles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chipmunk, run in circles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(chipmunk, run in circles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chipmunk, run in circles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chipmunk, run in circles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(rabbit, run in circles)