chiropractic: be covered by insurance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents modality
Weight: 0.64
, method
Weight: 0.60
, field
Weight: 0.59
, health
Weight: 0.57
Siblings acupuncture
Weight: 0.35
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.34
, reflexology
Weight: 0.34
, massage
Weight: 0.34
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered by insurance 1.00
have things insurance 0.86
is insurance premiums 0.84
have separate things insurance 0.84
be choice insurance 0.83
have insurance contracts 0.81
be covered in plastic 0.81
have aleatory insurance contracts 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(health, have aleatory insurance contracts)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(field, be covered in plastic)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(field, be covered in plastic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(health, have aleatory insurance contracts)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(field, be covered in plastic)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(health, have aleatory insurance contracts)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, be covered by insurance)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, be covered by insurance)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(field, be covered in plastic)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(health, have aleatory insurance contracts)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(ultrasound, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, be covered by insurance)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(acupuncture, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, be covered by insurance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(field, be covered in plastic)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(health, have aleatory insurance contracts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(acupuncture, be covered by insurance)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ultrasound, be covered by insurance)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(field, be covered in plastic)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(chiropractic, be covered by insurance)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(health, have aleatory insurance contracts)