chlamydia: be similar to viruses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.54
, organism
Weight: 0.33
Siblings syphilis
Weight: 0.35
, gonorrhea
Weight: 0.35
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.34
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be similar to viruses 1.00
has state viruses 0.93
be different from other bacteria 0.83
is unique bacteria 0.79
is bacterial infection 0.79
is bacteria 0.79
is bacterial 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, is bacterial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chlamydia, has state viruses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(chlamydia, has state viruses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, is bacterial)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)