chlamydia: is bacterial infection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.54
, organism
Weight: 0.33
Siblings syphilis
Weight: 0.35
, gonorrhea
Weight: 0.35
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.34
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bacterial infection 1.00
is bacterial 0.95
is infection 0.93
is bacteria 0.90
is unique bacteria 0.87
be different from other bacteria 0.85
has state viruses 0.79
be similar to viruses 0.79
has state disease 0.78
is social disease 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, has state disease)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state disease)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, is infection)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(gonorrhea, is bacterial)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, is bacterial)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(gonorrhea, is infection)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, is infection)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(genital herpes, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(syphilis, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(syphilis, has state disease)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(gonorrhea, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, has state disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state viruses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, has state disease)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is bacteria)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is social disease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(chlamydia, has state viruses)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(chlamydia, has state disease)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, has state viruses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, has state disease)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is social disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(chlamydia, has state disease)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is social disease)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is social disease)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is unique bacteria)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chlamydia, has state viruses)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chlamydia, be different from other bacteria)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chlamydia, be similar to viruses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, is bacterial)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, is infection)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(genital herpes, has state disease)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, is bacterial infection)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state disease)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is bacterial infection)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, has state disease)