chocolate bar: be much more expensive days

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chocolate
Weight: 0.80
, sweet
Weight: 0.72
, junk food
Weight: 0.68
, bar
Weight: 0.66
Siblings wrapper
Weight: 0.53
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.40
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.40
, candy bar
Weight: 0.40
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much more expensive days 1.00
is expensive 0.84
become longer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(chocolate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(bar, become longer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(chocolate, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(bar, become longer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bar, become longer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(chocolate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(bar, become longer)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(chocolate milk, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(white chocolate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, is expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, is expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chocolate bar, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chocolate, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bar, become longer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(white chocolate, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(chocolate, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(chocolate bar, be much more expensive days)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bar, become longer)