chocolate: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.72
, dessert
Weight: 0.68
, indulgence
Weight: 0.66
, ice cream
Weight: 0.64
, snack
Weight: 0.64
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.74
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.67
, truffle
Weight: 0.54
, fudge
Weight: 0.47
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality wrong 0.87
has quality change 0.86
be bad for health 0.81
taste bad 0.80
go bad 0.79
taste good 0.77
be good in food 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indulgence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ice cream, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be bad for health)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indulgence, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality wrong)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indulgence, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for health)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(truffle, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fudge, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(truffle, taste bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(truffle, taste good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(indulgence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ice cream, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(indulgence, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(truffle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(truffle, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(fudge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fudge, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(truffle, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(truffle, taste bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, taste good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(truffle, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(truffle, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(chocolate, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chocolate, be good in food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be good in food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(chocolate, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chocolate, be good in food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indulgence, has quality wrong)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indulgence, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ice cream, be bad for health)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(truffle, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fudge, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(truffle, taste bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(truffle, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indulgence, has quality wrong)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indulgence, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ice cream, be bad for health)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(chocolate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)