chopstick: be at in restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.48
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.35
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.35
, razor blade
Weight: 0.34
, dumpling
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.99
be at resturant 0.84
be at store 0.77
be used to eat sushi 0.77
be at supermarket 0.76
be at kitchen 0.76
be find in kitchen 0.76
be at kitchen and bathroom store 0.76
be at dine table 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tool, be at store)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(utensil, be find in kitchen)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(utensil, be find in kitchen)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tool, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tool, be at store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be find in kitchen)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at in restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at resturant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen and bathroom store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at kitchen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tool, be at store)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(utensil, be find in kitchen)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spoon, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at in restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be at resturant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at resturant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(spoon, be at supermarket)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at supermarket)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(spoon, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at kitchen)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen and bathroom store)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen and bathroom store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(chopstick, be at in restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at restaurant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at resturant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(chopstick, be at restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(chopstick, be used to eat sushi)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at dine table)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chopstick, be at dine table)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be used to eat sushi)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at resturant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at kitchen)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at dine table)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be used to eat sushi)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at kitchen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(chopstick, be used to eat sushi)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at dine table)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at resturant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(chopstick, be at resturant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at kitchen)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(chopstick, be at kitchen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tool, be at store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(utensil, be find in kitchen)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(spoon, be at in restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(spoon, be at kitchen)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(kitchen utensil, be at kitchen and bathroom store)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(spoon, be at resturant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spoon, be at supermarket)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tool, be at store)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(utensil, be find in kitchen)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chopstick, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)