chopstick: be at table

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.48
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.35
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.35
, razor blade
Weight: 0.34
, dumpling
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at table 1.00
be at table set 0.90
be at dine table 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at table)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be at table set)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(spoon, be at table)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at table)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(spoon, be at table set)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(spoon, be at table set)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chopstick, be at table)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chopstick, be at dine table)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at dine table)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be at dine table)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at dine table)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at table)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chopstick, be at table)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(spoon, be at table)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be at table)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(spoon, be at table set)