chopstick: be better than forks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.48
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.35
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.35
, razor blade
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than forks 1.00
be used instead of forks 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be better than forks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chopstick, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(spoon, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(spoon, be better than forks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chopstick, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(chopstick, be better than forks)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chopstick, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be used instead of forks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(chopstick, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chopstick, be used instead of forks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(chopstick, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(chopstick, be used instead of forks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chopstick, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be used instead of forks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(chopstick, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(chopstick, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be better than forks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chopstick, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(chopstick, be better than forks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be better than forks)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(spoon, be better than forks)