chow: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.41
, restaurant
Weight: 0.39
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.35
, small dog
Weight: 0.34
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.34
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.34
, police dog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
have curly tails 0.81
has physical part tongues 0.80
has physical part tongue 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chow, have curly tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chow, have curly tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chow, have curly tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chow, have curly tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chow, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)