chow: has physical part tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.41
, restaurant
Weight: 0.39
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.35
, small dog
Weight: 0.34
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.34
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.34
, police dog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tongues 1.00
has physical part tongue 0.91
have black tongues 0.91
have blue tongues 0.89
have purple tongues 0.88
has tongue 0.85
have black tongue 0.84
have blue tongue 0.82
has physical part tails 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chow, has tongue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(chow, has tongue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chow, have purple tongues)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chow, have black tongues)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(chow, has tongue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chow, have blue tongues)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chow, have black tongue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chow, have blue tongue)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(chow, have black tongue)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chow, have blue tongue)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chow, have black tongues)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chow, have purple tongues)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chow, have blue tongues)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(chow, have purple tongues)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chow, have black tongue)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chow, have black tongue)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chow, have blue tongue)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chow, have purple tongues)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(chow, have black tongues)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(chow, have blue tongues)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chow, have blue tongues)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chow, has tongue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)