chow: have blue tongue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.41
, restaurant
Weight: 0.39
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.35
, small dog
Weight: 0.34
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.34
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.34
, police dog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have blue tongue 1.00
have black tongue 0.96
has tongue 0.93
have blue tongues 0.91
have purple tongues 0.89
has physical part tongue 0.89
have black tongues 0.86
be chows tongue blue 0.84
has physical part tongues 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chow, have blue tongue)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chow, has tongue)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(chow, has tongue)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(chow, has tongue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chow, have black tongue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(chow, have black tongue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chow, have black tongue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chow, has physical part tongues)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(chow, have purple tongues)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(chow, have blue tongues)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chow, have black tongue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(chow, have purple tongues)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chow, have blue tongues)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chow, have blue tongues)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chow, have purple tongues)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(chow, have black tongues)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chow, have blue tongues)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chow, have purple tongues)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chow, have black tongues)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chow, have black tongues)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(chow, be chows tongue blue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chow, be chows tongue blue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chow, have black tongues)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chow, be chows tongue blue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chow, be chows tongue blue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chow, has tongue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chow, have blue tongue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(chow, have blue tongue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chow, have blue tongue)