cicada: be in areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.47
, animal
Weight: 0.44
, bug
Weight: 0.42
, bird
Weight: 0.41
Siblings mosquito bite
Weight: 0.35
, ladybug
Weight: 0.35
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.35
, aphid
Weight: 0.35
, mosquito
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in areas 1.00
be in certain areas 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cicada, be in areas)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(cicada, be in areas)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cicada, be in areas)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cicada, be in certain areas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(cicada, be in areas)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cicada, be in certain areas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cicada, be in areas)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cicada, be in certain areas)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cicada, be in areas)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cicada, be in certain areas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(cicada, be in areas)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cicada, be in areas)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cicada, be in areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cicada, be in areas)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cicada, be in areas)