cicada: rub wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.47
, animal
Weight: 0.44
, bug
Weight: 0.42
, bird
Weight: 0.41
Siblings mosquito bite
Weight: 0.35
, ladybug
Weight: 0.35
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.35
, aphid
Weight: 0.35
, mosquito
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
rub wings 1.00
rub legs 0.89
has physical part wings 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cicada, rub wings)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cicada, rub wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has physical part wings)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cicada, rub wings)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cicada, rub wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(aphid, has physical part wings)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ladybug, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(ladybug, has physical part wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(cicada, rub wings)

Similarity expansion

0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cicada, has physical part wings)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cicada, has physical part wings)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cicada, has physical part wings)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cicada, has physical part wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cicada, rub wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(aphid, has physical part wings)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ladybug, has physical part wings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(cicada, rub wings)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)