cider: be in bottles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.73
, liquid
Weight: 0.60
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.58
, product
Weight: 0.58
, beverage
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lager
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.38
, apple juice
Weight: 0.37
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.37
, beer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in bottles 1.00
be in brown bottles 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(beer, be in brown bottles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beer, be in bottles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(beer, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beer, be in bottles)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(beer, be in brown bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(beer, be in brown bottles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cider, be in bottles)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cider, be in brown bottles)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cider, be in brown bottles)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cider, be in brown bottles)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cider, be in brown bottles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cider, be in bottles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cider, be in bottles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(beer, be in bottles)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cider, be in bottles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(beer, be in brown bottles)