cinderella: is good role model

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fairy tale
Weight: 0.71
, princess
Weight: 0.66
, story
Weight: 0.65
, tale
Weight: 0.65
, heroine
Weight: 0.62
Siblings santa claus
Weight: 0.33
, romance
Weight: 0.33
, snow queen
Weight: 0.32
, jonah
Weight: 0.32
, shrek
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good role model 1.00
is bad role model 0.99
is role model 0.98
is dynamic character 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, is good role model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(shrek, is dynamic character)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cinderella, is good role model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(shrek, is dynamic character) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(shrek, is dynamic character)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cinderella, is good role model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cinderella, is good role model)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cinderella, is good role model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cinderella, is bad role model)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(cinderella, is good role model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cinderella, is bad role model)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cinderella, is good role model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cinderella, is bad role model)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cinderella, is good role model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, is bad role model)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cinderella, is good role model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cinderella, is good role model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, is good role model)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cinderella, is good role model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cinderella, is good role model)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, is good role model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(shrek, is dynamic character)