circuit breaker: apply to expansion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents short circuit
Weight: 0.68
, electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, device
Weight: 0.64
, circuit
Weight: 0.62
Siblings integrated circuit
Weight: 0.39
, network device
Weight: 0.34
, thermistor
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
apply to expansion 1.00
have caps on memory expansion 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(device, have caps on memory expansion)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(device, have caps on memory expansion)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(device, have caps on memory expansion)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(device, have caps on memory expansion)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(device, have caps on memory expansion)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(circuit breaker, apply to expansion)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(device, have caps on memory expansion)