circuit breaker: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents short circuit
Weight: 0.68
, electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, device
Weight: 0.64
, circuit
Weight: 0.62
Siblings integrated circuit
Weight: 0.39
, network device
Weight: 0.34
, thermistor
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
is terrible 0.79
has quality bad 0.79
is gone 0.78
keep going 0.78
keep going off 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, go bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(network device, is gone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(network device, is gone)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(network device, is gone)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(circuit breaker, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, keep going)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, keep going off)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, keep going)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, keep going off)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(circuit breaker, keep going off)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(circuit breaker, keep going)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, keep going off)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, keep going)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(network device, is gone)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(circuit breaker, go bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)