circuit breaker: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents short circuit
Weight: 0.68
, electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, device
Weight: 0.64
, circuit
Weight: 0.62
Siblings integrated circuit
Weight: 0.39
, network device
Weight: 0.34
, thermistor
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
has quality worse 0.90
be better than series 0.78
has quality question 0.76
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(circuit, be better than series)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(short circuit, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(short circuit, has quality worse)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(circuit, be better than series)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(short circuit, has quality worse)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be better than series)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(short circuit, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(circuit, be better than series)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(microprocessor, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(circuit breaker, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality worse)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(circuit, be better than series)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality worse)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(circuit, be better than series)