circuit: be connected in parallel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents circuit breaker
Weight: 0.76
, integrated circuit
Weight: 0.75
, function
Weight: 0.58
, structure
Weight: 0.57
Siblings timer
Weight: 0.61
, module
Weight: 0.61
, attenuator
Weight: 0.60
, filter
Weight: 0.59
, flip flop
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be connected in parallel 1.00
be parallel 0.91
be in homes connected in parallel 0.91
is parallel 0.91
be connected 0.87
is connected 0.87
have connected in series 0.83
be connected with other elements 0.82
be connected with elements 0.81
be in house connected 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(function, be parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(circuit breaker, be connected with other elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(circuit breaker, is connected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(circuit breaker, be connected with elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, is connected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, be connected with elements)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, be connected with other elements)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(function, be parallel)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(function, be parallel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, is connected)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, be connected with other elements)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, be connected with elements)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(module, be connected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(function, be parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(circuit breaker, is connected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(circuit breaker, be connected with other elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(circuit breaker, be connected with elements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(module, be connected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(module, be connected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(circuit, be connected in parallel)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(circuit, be in homes connected in parallel)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be in homes connected in parallel)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(circuit, be in homes connected in parallel)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(circuit, is connected)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(circuit, is parallel)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(circuit, is parallel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(circuit, is connected)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(circuit, is connected)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(circuit, be in homes connected in parallel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(circuit, is parallel)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(circuit, is connected)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(circuit, is parallel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, is connected)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, be connected with elements)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, be connected with other elements)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(function, be parallel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(module, be connected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, is connected)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, be connected with elements)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, be connected with other elements)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(circuit, be connected in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(function, be parallel)