circuit: be preferred to diodes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents circuit breaker
Weight: 0.76
, integrated circuit
Weight: 0.75
, function
Weight: 0.58
, structure
Weight: 0.57
Siblings timer
Weight: 0.61
, module
Weight: 0.61
, attenuator
Weight: 0.60
, filter
Weight: 0.59
, flip flop
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be preferred to diodes 1.00
be preferred to transistors 0.80
need capacitors 0.79
be connected at output of rectifiers 0.77
use voltage 0.76
need resistor 0.75
have voltage 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(integrated circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(integrated circuit, be preferred to transistors)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(circuit, be preferred to diodes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, be preferred to diodes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, be preferred to transistors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be preferred to diodes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be preferred to transistors)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(filter, be connected at output of rectifiers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(integrated circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(integrated circuit, be preferred to transistors)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(circuit, be preferred to diodes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(filter, be connected at output of rectifiers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(filter, be connected at output of rectifiers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(circuit, be preferred to diodes)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(circuit, be preferred to transistors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(circuit, be preferred to transistors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(circuit, use voltage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to transistors)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(circuit, be preferred to transistors)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(circuit, use voltage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(circuit, need capacitors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(circuit, need resistor)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(circuit, use voltage)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(circuit, need resistor)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(circuit, need resistor)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(circuit, need capacitors)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(circuit, need capacitors)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(circuit, need resistor)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circuit, need capacitors)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(circuit, use voltage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(circuit, be preferred to diodes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be preferred to diodes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be preferred to transistors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(filter, be connected at output of rectifiers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be preferred to diodes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(circuit, be preferred to diodes)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be preferred to transistors)