circulatory system: has quality advantage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.72
, human body
Weight: 0.59
, artery
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, organism
Weight: 0.56
Siblings aorta
Weight: 0.56
, lymphatic system
Weight: 0.38
, digestive system
Weight: 0.38
, immune system
Weight: 0.37
, respiratory system
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality advantage 1.00
seen as advantage 0.88
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality advantage)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tissue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality advantage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality advantage)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(circulatory system, seen as advantage)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(circulatory system, seen as advantage)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, seen as advantage)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, seen as advantage)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(circulatory system, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circulatory system, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality advantage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(circulatory system, has quality advantage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(circulatory system, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)