circumcision: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.65
, ritual
Weight: 0.64
, law
Weight: 0.61
, surgery
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
Siblings female circumcision
Weight: 0.37
, vasectomy
Weight: 0.36
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.35
, mastectomy
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
make perfect 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(surgery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ritual, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(practice, make perfect)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ritual, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(surgery, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(practice, make perfect)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(surgery, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ritual, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(practice, make perfect)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(surgery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ritual, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(practice, make perfect)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(female circumcision, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(circumcision, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(circumcision, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(practice, make perfect)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ritual, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(surgery, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(female circumcision, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(female circumcision, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ritual, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(surgery, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(circumcision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(practice, make perfect)