city: be at state

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at state 1.00
be a part of state 0.93
be at any state 0.89
be at place besides state 0.81
be at county 0.79
be defined as large city in unite state 0.78
be at unite state 0.77
be at country 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(town, be at state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(city, be at state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(town, be at any state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(city, be at state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(town, be at county)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(city, be at state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(town, be at state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(town, be at any state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(town, be at county)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(town, be at any state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(town, be at county)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(town, be at state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(national park, be at place besides state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(town, be at state)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(city, be at state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(town, be at any state)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(city, be at state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(town, be at county)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(city, be at state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(national park, be at place besides state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(national park, be at place besides state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(city, be at state)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(city, be a part of state)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(city, be a part of state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(city, be a part of state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(city, be at country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(city, be at country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(city, be at unite state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(city, be at country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(city, be at unite state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(city, be at unite state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(city, be a part of state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(city, be at unite state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(city, be at country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(city, be at state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(town, be at state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(town, be at any state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(town, be at county)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(national park, be at place besides state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(new york city, be defined as large city in unite state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(town, be at state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(town, be at any state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(city, be at state)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(town, be at county)