city: be crowd

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be crowd 1.00
be more crowd that country 0.90
be more crowd than rural area 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(city, be crowd)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(city, be more crowd that country)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(city, be crowd)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(city, be more crowd that country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(city, be more crowd that country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(city, be crowd)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(city, be crowd)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(city, be crowd)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(city, be more crowd than rural area)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(city, be more crowd that country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(city, be more crowd than rural area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(city, be crowd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(city, be crowd)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(city, be crowd)