city: be located on river

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.71
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, medina
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be located on river 1.00
is located by river 0.98
be located near rivers 0.94
be located along rivers 0.92
be located near water 0.90
be located near ocean 0.89
be located close to water 0.87
be located near bodies of water 0.87
be located by body of water 0.86
be located near mountains 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(town, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(city, be located on river)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(city, be located on river)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(town, be located by body of water)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(city, be located on river)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(town, be located on river)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(town, be located by body of water)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(town, be located on river)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(town, be located by body of water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(town, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(city, be located on river)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(city, be located on river)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(town, be located by body of water)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(city, be located on river)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(city, be located on river)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(city, be located along rivers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(city, be located along rivers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(city, be located along rivers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(city, be located near ocean)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(city, be located near ocean)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(city, be located along rivers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(city, be located near ocean)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(city, be located near water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(city, be located near ocean)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(city, be located close to water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(city, be located by body of water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, be located near bodies of water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(city, be located near water)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(city, be located by body of water)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(city, be located close to water)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, be located by body of water)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(city, be located near bodies of water)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(city, be located near bodies of water)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(city, be located near water)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(city, be located by body of water)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(city, be located close to water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(city, be located near water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(city, be located close to water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(city, be located near bodies of water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be located on river)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(city, be located on river)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(town, be located on river)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(town, be located by body of water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(town, be located on river)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(town, be located by body of water)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)