city: be nicknamed apple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.71
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, medina
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be nicknamed apple 1.00
be nicknamed big apple 0.98
be known as apple 0.86
be called apple 0.86
be known as big apple 0.85
be called big apple 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed big apple)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called apple)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be known as apple)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called big apple)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be known as big apple)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(new york city, be nicknamed big apple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(new york city, be nicknamed big apple)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(new york city, be known as apple)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new york city, be known as apple)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(new york city, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called apple)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(new york city, be known as big apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(new york city, be called big apple)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called big apple)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(city, be nicknamed apple)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(city, be called apple)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(city, be known as apple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(city, be called apple)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(city, be called apple)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(city, be known as apple)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(city, be called apple)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(city, be known as apple)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(city, be known as apple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(city, be nicknamed apple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed apple)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be nicknamed big apple)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new york city, be called apple)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as apple)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be known as big apple)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(city, be nicknamed apple)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, be called big apple)