city: develop plan for recycle garbage

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
develop plan for recycle garbage 1.00
has recycle program 0.88
has place to deposit recycle material 0.81
collect garbage citywide 0.81
be fill with much trash 0.80
organize their own refuse collection 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(city, develop plan for recycle garbage)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(city, collect garbage citywide)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(city, has recycle program)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(city, be fill with much trash)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(city, organize their own refuse collection)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(city, has place to deposit recycle material)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(city, collect garbage citywide)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(city, be fill with much trash)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(city, has recycle program)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(city, has recycle program)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(city, organize their own refuse collection)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(city, organize their own refuse collection)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(city, has recycle program)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(city, organize their own refuse collection)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(city, has place to deposit recycle material)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(city, has place to deposit recycle material)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(city, be fill with much trash)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(city, has place to deposit recycle material)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(city, collect garbage citywide)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(city, be fill with much trash)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(city, collect garbage citywide)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(city, develop plan for recycle garbage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(city, develop plan for recycle garbage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, develop plan for recycle garbage)