city: has few tree than forrest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has few tree than forrest 1.00
be a part of few tree than forrest 0.99
has tree and flower 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(park, has tree and flower)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, has few tree than forrest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(park, has tree and flower)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(park, has tree and flower)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(park, has tree and flower)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(city, has few tree than forrest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(city, has few tree than forrest)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(city, be a part of few tree than forrest)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be a part of few tree than forrest)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(city, be a part of few tree than forrest)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(city, be a part of few tree than forrest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(city, has few tree than forrest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, has few tree than forrest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(park, has tree and flower)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(city, has few tree than forrest)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(park, has tree and flower)