claim: be in small claims court

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lie
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.61
, belief
Weight: 0.61
, speculation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings proof
Weight: 0.69
, appeal
Weight: 0.59
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.59
, breach
Weight: 0.58
, intrusion
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in small claims court 1.00
be heard by courts 0.76
heard by courts 0.76
be heard by higher courts 0.75
heard by higher courts 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be heard by higher courts)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be heard by courts)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(appeal, heard by higher courts)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appeal, heard by courts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(appeal, be heard by courts)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(appeal, be heard by courts)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(appeal, heard by courts)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(appeal, heard by courts)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(appeal, heard by higher courts)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(appeal, heard by higher courts)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(appeal, be heard by higher courts)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(appeal, be heard by higher courts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(claim, be in small claims court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(claim, be in small claims court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(claim, be in small claims court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(appeal, be heard by courts)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(appeal, heard by courts)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(appeal, heard by higher courts)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(claim, be in small claims court)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(appeal, be heard by higher courts)