classical music: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents folk music
Weight: 0.83
, pop music
Weight: 0.74
, music
Weight: 0.72
, rock music
Weight: 0.71
Siblings chamber music
Weight: 0.77
, country music
Weight: 0.73
, symphony
Weight: 0.65
, classical
Weight: 0.64
, opera
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality better 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(folk music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(folk music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(folk music, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(opera, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(folk music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(symphony, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(symphony, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(opera, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(opera, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(country music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(country music, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(classical music, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(classical music, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(classical music, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(folk music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(symphony, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(opera, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(country music, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(folk music, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(classical music, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)