cleanliness: be important in correct workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, virtue
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, standard
Weight: 0.62
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.34
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33
, satisfaction
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.32
, fecal matter
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in correct workplace 1.00
be important in workplace 0.91
be in workplace 0.87
be important in ergonomically correct workplace 0.83
be necessary for health 0.76
be important at work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(friendliness, be important in workplace)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in workplace)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important at work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(friendliness, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(friendliness, be important in workplace)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(consistency, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in workplace)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(consistency, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important at work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be in workplace)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be in workplace)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be in workplace)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be necessary for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in workplace)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important in workplace)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important in workplace)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be necessary for health)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important at work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in workplace)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be in workplace)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important at work)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in ergonomically correct workplace)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important at work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be necessary for health)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important at work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important in ergonomically correct workplace)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important in ergonomically correct workplace)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in ergonomically correct workplace)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be necessary for health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(friendliness, be important in workplace)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in workplace)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in correct workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(consistency, be important at work)