cleanliness: be important to us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, virtue
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, standard
Weight: 0.62
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.34
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33
, satisfaction
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.32
, fecal matter
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to us 1.00
be important for us 0.99
be important to cristians 0.87
be important at work 0.82
be important in business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(standard, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(virtue, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(virtue, be important to us)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(virtue, be important to us)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important at work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(consistency, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(virtue, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(standard, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(consistency, be important at work)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important at work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(consistency, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(consistency, be important in business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(quality, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important to us)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important for us)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to cristians)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important at work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important for us)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important at work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important in business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important to cristians)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cleanliness, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important at work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important for us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cleanliness, be important to cristians)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important to cristians)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important for us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important at work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(virtue, be important to us)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(standard, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(consistency, be important at work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(consistency, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(virtue, be important to us)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(standard, be important in business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cleanliness, be important to us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)