clerk: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents office worker
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.60
, court
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, cashier
Weight: 0.35
, paralegal
Weight: 0.34
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
has state jobs 0.88
is work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, has state jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cashier, is work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, is work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(supervisor, has state job)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(pharmacist, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(pharmacist, has state jobs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(supervisor, is work)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(supervisor, is work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cashier, is work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cashier, is work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(clerk, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(clerk, has state jobs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(clerk, has state jobs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(clerk, is work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(clerk, has state jobs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(clerk, is work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(clerk, is work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state jobs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(clerk, is work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(clerk, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(supervisor, is work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cashier, is work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(supervisor, has state job)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state job)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pharmacist, has state jobs)