clerk: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents office worker
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.60
, court
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supervisor
Weight: 0.35
, cashier
Weight: 0.35
, paralegal
Weight: 0.34
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
has state job 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pharmacist, has state jobs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(pharmacist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(pharmacist, has state jobs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supervisor, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(supervisor, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(clerk, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(clerk, has state job)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(clerk, has state job)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(clerk, has state job)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(clerk, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pharmacist, has state jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(clerk, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(supervisor, has state job)